Aside from these things that are fun to talk about over beers, I really wish Java would pick up a few things from Scala that are just plain more convenient.
Multi-line string literalsA great way to structure a unit test is to feed in a chunk of text, run some processing that you want to verify, convert the actual output to text, and then compare it against another chunk of text that's included in the test case. Compared to a dense string of
assertEqualscalls, this testing pattern tends to be much easier to read and understand at a glance. When such a test fails, you can read a text diff at a glance and possibly see multiple different kinds of failure that happened with the test, rather than stare into the thicket of
assertEqualscalls and try to deduce what is being tested by the particular one that failed.
The biggest weakness of this style is very mundane: it's hard to encode a multi-line chunk of text in Java. You have to choose between putting the text in an external file, or suffering through strings that have a lot of "\n" escapes in them. Both choices have problems, although the latter option could be mitigated with a little bit of IDE support.
In Scala, Python, and many other languages, you can write a multi-line string by opening it with triple quotes (""") rather than a single quote mark ("). It's a trivial feature that adds a lot to the day to day convenience of using the language.
As one trick to be aware of, it's important to help people out with indentation when using triple quotes. In Scala, I lobbied for the
stripMargin approach to dealing with indentation, where you put a pipe on each continuation line, and anything up to the pipe is considered leading indentation and removed. In retrospect, I wish I had pushed for that to simply be the default behavior. If you need to insert a literal continuation character, you can always write it twice. Making people write
stripMargin on almost every multi-line string is a form of boilerplate.
Case classesThere are philosophers who disagree, but I find them a little too philosophical for my taste. Sometimes you really want to write a class that has no hidden internal state. Sometimes it would be a breach of the API to retain any internal state, or to implement the public API as anything other than plain old final fields. Some motivating examples are: tiny types, data structure nodes such as links in a linked list, and data-transfer objects.
In such a case, it takes a tremendous amount of code in Java to implement all the odds and ends you would really like for such a class. You would really like all of the following, and they are all completely mechanical:
- Constructors that copy their parameters to a series of final fields.
- A toString() implementation.
- Comparison operations: equals(), hashCode(), and compareTo(). Ideally also helpers such as isLessThan().
- Copy constructors that make a new version by replacing just one of the fields with a new value.
Post a Comment